Should libraries charge overdue fines?

Written by

in

I have never, as far as I remember, been fined for overdue library books. I’ve always returned the books or renewed them if I can’t bring them back in time. My local service has now abolished fines for overdue library books for adults (they already did this for children) and all existing fines are cancelled. This is to remove barriers to the service; some people are apparently put off from borrowing at all, for fear of fines. It may also result in long-overdue books being returned, a book amnesty of sorts. The downsides are, I think, the loss of income to the library (although I don’t know if libraries tend to make much from fines) and that some customers will undoubtedly keep their books well past the due date, denying others the chance to read them. Thinking about it carefully, it’s probably the right choice. Library fines seem a little old-fashioned, belonging to an era of silent reading rooms with shh-ing librarians, card catalogue indexes and ink-stamping the due dates. Public libraries have changed and the more people who feel comfortable using them, the better. Anything that encourages people to read is worth trying, and this includes abolishing overdue fees. What do you think?


Discover more from N S Ford

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

3 responses to “Should libraries charge overdue fines?”

  1. Sharon's Writers Tidbits avatar

    Personally, I agree with the abolition of overdue fines. Potential fines have been a big reason why I don’t borrow from my local library as much.

    But how else can libraries prevent lenders from holding on to popular books or new releases?

    Interesting post!

    1. nsford avatar
      nsford

      Thanks. Yes, that’s the difficulty, hopefully the majority of library users will stick to the rules, even without the threat of fines!

      1. Sharon's Writers Tidbits avatar

        I hear that!

Leave a Reply