Review of ‘The Beach’ by Alex Garland

What do you get if you mix The Lord of the Flies, Castaway and a lot of dope? The Beach, by Alex Garland.

I read this book in 2007 and remember that I felt underwhelmed, but not why this was so. After all, the book is now a cult classic and I like the author’s subsequent film work. So I borrowed it from the library for a re-read.

The narrator of the story is Richard, a traveller and adventure seeker who’s always looking for the next authentic location away from the tourists and the phoneys. He’s looking back on the events. In Thailand, a mentally unstable man, Daffy, tells him about a beach. Daffy then commits suicide. Richard decides to find this mysterious beach, along with a French couple from the same guesthouse. The majority of the story is set on the beach, examining the tension between the people of this select community. They live an isolated existence which is supposed to be idyllic but then everything starts to go wrong.

Mostly, the book is a gripping read, with an interesting (not particularly likeable) narrator. That Richard is followed around by the ghost of Daffy, who is really a reflection of himself and his obsession with the Vietnam War and video games, adds an edgy dimension. I’m not keen on Robinson Crusoe survivor-type narratives, however, so the details about how the people of the beach caught their fish, worked their vegetable plots, etc, were rather dull. This was, I suspect, what I didn’t like the first time I read the book.

Ironically for a novel about the quest to find unspoilt corners of paradise, the film adaptation in 2000 (which I haven’t seen) garnered controversy for altering the location in which it was filmed and of course there were increased numbers of visitors as a result, no doubt turning it into a place Richard would have avoided.

First published in 1996.


Discover more from N S Ford

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

16 responses to “Review of ‘The Beach’ by Alex Garland”

  1. RoseReadsNovels avatar

    I’m the opposite to you, loved reading about how they caught their fish etc! The scenery in the movie is spectacular, although it wasn’t how I imagined it.

    1. nsford avatar
      nsford

      That’s funny ๐Ÿ˜€ I would be interested in seeing the film.

      1. RoseReadsNovels avatar

        Just one warning, Richard’s character isn’t any more likeable in the film ๐Ÿ™‚

        1. nsford avatar
          nsford

          Thanks for that ๐Ÿ˜€

  2. nickimags @ The Secret Library Book Blog avatar

    Great review! I’ve had a secondhand copy of this on my shelf for so long and still haven’t read it!๐Ÿ˜‚

    1. nsford avatar
      nsford

      Thanks! Oh really? Did my review make you want to pick it up, or not? ๐Ÿ˜€

      1. nickimags @ The Secret Library Book Blog avatar

        It made me glad I hadn’t read it!

        1. nsford avatar
          nsford

          LOL – I guess you can get rid of your copy now

  3. Callum McLaughlin avatar

    I love Alex Garland as a filmmaker but Iโ€™ve never read this, so I should really check it out at some point!

    1. nsford avatar
      nsford

      It seems he focused on his film career rather than his novelist career ๐Ÿ™‚ It’s worth reading at least once, I can’t predict if you will like it though.

  4. R A I N avatar

    EEEEK!!! That does sound a tad bit boring..OKAY A LOT BORING! THANK YOU N! Your reviews are a life saver! ๐Ÿ˜‰

    1. nsford avatar
      nsford

      Obviously it wasn’t boring to everyone, as a lot of people love this book, but yes maybe half of it was too dull for me ๐Ÿ˜€

  5. Meggy | Chocolate'n'Waffles avatar

    Great review! I was bored when studying Robinson Crusoe haha!

    1. nsford avatar
      nsford

      I had to study Robinson Crusoe too! Wow it was tough to get through. The Beach is more readable than that ๐Ÿ˜‰

  6. Jee Wan avatar

    Saw the film dont intend to read the book hahaa love your review! ๐Ÿ™‚

    1. nsford avatar
      nsford

      Thanks! ๐Ÿ™‚

Leave a Reply to Meggy | Chocolate’n’WafflesCancel reply